Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional ATCS versus usual care or letter at longer (9‐12 months) · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Behavioural outcome: cervical cancer screening ATCS Plus versus control (no calls) at 3 month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis
1 finding from 1 review
Denver Developmental Screening Test more than 30 days of commencement of therapy · children less than 3 years of age with iron deficiency anaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Health outcomes: Drug misuse and dependence CAGE screening tool. Scale from 0 to 4. Higher score indicates greater probability of drug misuse or dependence · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review
Health service outcome: uptake of preventive screening · Adultsa
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Perception ‐ screening message (measured as rating on a scale of perceived effectiveness) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Persuasiveness ‐ screening message (measured as a hypothetical decision or intention or willingness to adopt an intervention) · consumers
1 finding from 1 review
Toluidine blue (visual staining) vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Brush biopsy (oral cytology) vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Fluorescence imaging / light-based techniques vs No screening
Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Congruence between informed values and choice ‐ all studies Based on the proportion of participants who made a decision that aligned with what was most important to them. Assessed soon after exposure to the decision aid. · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
Patient decision aids probably leads to higher congruence between informed values and choice ‐ all studies Based on… compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
1 finding from 1 review
Accurate risk perception · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
Patient decision aids leads to higher accurate risk perceptions ‐ all studies Based on the accuracy of… compared with usual care (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Decisional conflict: decision aid versus usual care ‐ all studies ‐ Uninformed sub‐scale standardized on score from 0 (not uninformed) to 100 (uninformed) [soon after exposure to the decision aid] · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
1 finding from 1 review
Unclear values · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
1 finding from 1 review
Participation in decision making: clinician‐controlled decision making ‐ all studies Assessed soon after consultation with clinician · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
Patient decision aids leads to lower participation in decision‐making: clinician‐controlled… compared with usual care (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Decision regret · adults considering treatment or screening decisions
1 finding from 1 review
Outcomes after 1‐ to 2‐year · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: cohort studies · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: RCT compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Incremental detection of invasive cancers · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental detection of invasive cancers compared with mammography alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review