Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

334 questions · 337 findings · 56 reviews

No studies found 77 · 22.8%GRADE not reported 5 · 1.5%Very low 113 · 33.5%Low 75 · 22.3%Moderate 61 · 18.1%High 6 · 1.8%

Intervention not reported

Minimally invasive step‐up approach: video‐assisted vs. endoscopic · people with necrotising pancreatitis

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes minimally invasive step‐up approach: video‐assisted vs. endoscopic (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Endoscopic drainage versus EUS‐guided drainage · patients with pancreatic pseudocysts

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes endoscopic drainage versus EUS‐guided drainage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Endoscopic drainage versus EUS‐guided drainage · patients with pancreatic pseudocysts

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes endoscopic drainage versus EUS‐guided drainage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Budesonide vs mesalamine

Remission (combined clinical and endoscopic remission) · Adult patients with active ulcerative colitis

Budesonide showed no clear difference in remission (combined clinical and endoscopic remission) compared with mesalamine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Etrolizumab vs placebo

Failure to induce endoscopic remission · patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Etrolizumab showed no clear difference in failure to enter endoscopic remission at week 6 compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review