Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

18 questions · 18 findings · 7 reviews · Wounds

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 44.4%Low 9 · 50%Moderate 1 · 5.6%High 0 · 0%

Irrigation with antibacterial solution vs irrigation with non‐antibacterial solution

Wound dehiscence · participants undergoing clean, clean‐contaminated, contaminated or dirty surgical procedures

It is very uncertain whether irrigation with antibacterial solution changes wound dehiscence compared with irrigation with non‐antibacterial solution (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure vs tension‐free midline closure

Wound dehiscence · pilonidal sinus

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure changes wound dehiscence compared with tension‐free midline closure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) vs off‐midline closure (Limberg flap)

Wound dehiscence · pilonidal sinus

Summary of findings table ‐ Off‐midline closure (Karydakis flap) showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with off‐midline closure (Limberg flap) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Wound dehiscence · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy showed no clear difference in dehiscence (proportion of participants in each group with wound… compared with standard dressing (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early dressing removal vs delayed dressing removal

Superficial wound dehiscence · people with surgical site infection

It is very uncertain whether early dressing removal changes superficial wound dehiscence Superficial wound dehiscence reported… compared with delayed dressing removal (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review