Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

40 questions · 40 findings · 17 reviews

No studies found 10 · 25%GRADE not reported 2 · 5%Very low 7 · 17.5%Low 11 · 27.5%Moderate 9 · 22.5%High 1 · 2.5%

Oral + inhaled dual therapy vs oral monotherapy

Serious adverse events. Outcome assessed on day 42 · bronchiectasis

It is very uncertain whether oral + inhaled dual therapy changes serious adverse events. Outcome assessed on day 42 compared with oral monotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sugammadex 4.0 mg/kg vs neostigmine (any dose)

Risk of adverse events and serious adverse eventsb, bradycardia, PONV, and signs of residual neuromuscular blockade · Adult patients, ASA I‐IV, who received non‐depolarizing NMBAs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg vs neostigmine (any dose)

Risk of adverse events and serious adverse eventsb, bradycardia, PONV, and signs of residual neuromuscular blockade · Adult patients, ASA I‐IV, who received non‐depolarizing NMBAs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review