What do systematic reviews say?

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Interventions vs conservative management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating brain arteriovenous malformations in adults 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 8.4
  1 study · 43 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 9.36 [3.1, 15.62]
  2 studies · 96 participants
  Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

• Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 68 participants
  Low

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rehabilitation interventions vs no intervention

Rehabilitation interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation… compared with no treatment or control; GRADE not reported.

• Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 6.5
  2 studies · 30 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes quality of life (improved or not improved ‐ derived from percentage… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 13 [2.07, 81.48]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Telerehabilitation services for stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 569 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Telerehabilitation services for stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Self‐management interventions vs usual care

Self management programmes showed no clear difference in quality of life Change scores/post intervention SF‐12 or ‐36:… compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.2 [0, 0.41]
  6 studies · 469 participants
  Low

Induced hypertension vs placebo or no intervention

• Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Antihypertensive agent vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Anticoagulant vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Lipid‐lowering agent vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Antiplatelet agent vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Lowered blood pressure vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found