Cochrane · systematic review · CD010442
Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke
Fryer, CE, Luker, JA, McDonnell, MN, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
StrokeAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 75%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Self management programmes compared with usual care for stroke
Population: adults with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quality of life Change scores/post intervention SF‐12 or ‐36: physical or mental functioning EuroQol; SAQoL; SSQoL Self management programmes vs usual care | SMD 0.2 [0, 0.41] | 6 studies · 469 participants | Low |
Self efficacy Change scores/postintervention Stroke self efficacy Locus of control Self management programmes vs usual care | SMD 0.33 [0.04, 0.61] | 6 studies · 403 participants | Low |
Activity limitations Change scores/post intervention FAI, NEADL, or BI Self management programmes vs usual care | SMD 0.22 | 4 studies · 160 participants | Moderate |
Impairments Change scores/post intervention HADS Self management programmes vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 648 participants | Low |