What do systematic reviews say?

Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Neither of these trials reported on the other secondary outcomes such as measures of pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or direct and indirect costs of interventions.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Chlorhexidine varnish vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  No trials reported on pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 111 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Trunk training following stroke 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 108 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• High‐dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs inactive control

• Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 437 participants
  Moderate

Postoperative use of LNG‐IUD vs postoperative GnRH‐a

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine device (LNG‐IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 54 participants
  Very low

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 600 participants
  Very low

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 1245 participants
  Low

Methods of enhancing vision and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 443 participants
  Very low

Methods of enhancing vision and/or group programmes vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 660 participants
  Moderate

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 375 participants
  Very low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs active control

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 464 participants
  Low

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 285 participants
  Low

Methods of enhancing vision vs no treatment or waiting list

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Methods of enhancing vision vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 262 participants
  Very low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 183 participants
  Very low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs no treatment or waiting list

• Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 193 participants
  Very low