Question · asked by 1 review

Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs no treatment: Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs

Population
Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or primary dentition, moderate to high caries risk
Intervention
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%)
Comparison
no treatment
Outcome
Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes
Neither of these trials reported on the other secondary outcomes such as measures of pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or direct and indirect costs of interventions.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents
2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
2015-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.