Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

59 questions · 64 findings · 23 reviews

No studies found 11 · 17.2%GRADE not reported 6 · 9.4%Very low 17 · 26.6%Low 22 · 34.4%Moderate 8 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

Ultrasound‐assisted catheter‐directed thrombolysis plus standard intravenous heparinisation vs standard intravenous heparinisation

All‐cause mortality (90‐day) · people with intermediate‐risk (submassive) APE

It is very uncertain whether ultrasound‐assisted catheter‐directed thrombolysis plus standard… changes all‐cause mortality (90‐day) compared with standard intravenous heparinisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Antithrombin III plus heparin vs heparin

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Antithrombin III plus heparin changes mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with heparin alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

All‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

All‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

All‐cause mortality (time‐to‐event) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (time‐to‐event) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review