Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 5 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 57.1%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 1 · 14.3%

Fetal biometry vs maternal glycaemic values

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their babies

It is very uncertain whether fetal biometry changes large‐for‐gestational age compared with maternal glycaemic values (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fetal biometry for guiding the medical management of women with gestational diabetes mellitus for improving maternal… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.81 [0.38, 1.74]
3 studies · 524 participants
Very low

Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes

Large‐for‐gestational age · Infants of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes

Metformin showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.67 [0.24, 1.83]
2 studies · 246 participants
Low

Metformin vs placebo

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with obesity during pregnancy

Metformin showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational‐age infant, defined as birthweight ≥ 90th… compared with placebo (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Metformin for women who are overweight or obese during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.7, 1.3]
2 studies · 831 participants
High

Metformin vs insulin

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with type 2 diabetes

It is very uncertain whether infant outcomes: oral anti‐diabetic agent (metformin) changes large‐for‐gestational age compared with insulin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral anti‐diabetic agents for women with established diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance or previous gestational… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.12 [0.73, 1.72]
1 study · 206 participants
Very low

Self‐monitoring vs periodic

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Self‐monitoring showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with periodic (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.5, 1.37]
2 studies · 400 participants
Low

Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with gestational diabetes mellitus

It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes large‐for‐gestational age compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.67 [0.43, 1.05]
1 study · 106 participants
Very low

Telemedicine vs usual care

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with gestational diabetes mellitus

It is very uncertain whether telemedicine changes large‐for‐gestational age compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.41 [0.76, 2.64]
3 studies · 228 participants
Very low