Cochrane · systematic review · CD011967

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes

Brown, J, Martis, R, Hughes, B, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
42
current version
GRADE rated
18
No studies
24
Included studies
NR
No studies 24 · 57.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 16.7%Low 10 · 23.8%Moderate 1 · 2.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies versus placebo ‐ maternal outcomes

Population: women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 24‐30 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy.
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ‐ (any type)
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 1.24 [0.81, 1.9]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Caearean section
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 1.03 [0.79, 1.34]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Development of type 2 diabetes ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Perineal trauma
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 0.98 [0.06, 15.62]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Return to pre‐pregnancy weight ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postnatal depression ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Induction of labour
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 1.18 [0.79, 1.76]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies versus placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes

Population: infants of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Large‐for‐gestational age
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 0.89 [0.51, 1.58]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Perinatal mortality
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Death or serious morbidity composite ‐ not reported
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 1.97 [0.36, 10.62]1 study · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Adiposity (neonate, child, adult) ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diabetes (child, adult) ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neurosensory disability in later childhood ‐ not measured
Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Metformin versus glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes

Population: women diagnosed with gestational diabetes
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 0.7 [0.38, 1.3]3 studies · 508 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Caesarean section
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 1.2 [0.83, 1.72]4 studies · 554 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Development of type 2 diabetes ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Perineal trauma
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 1.67 [0.22, 12.52]2 studies · 308 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Return to pre‐pregnancy weight ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postnatal depression ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Induction of labour
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 0.81 [0.61, 1.07]1 study · 159 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Metformin versus glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes

Population: Infants of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Large‐for‐gestational age
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 0.67 [0.24, 1.83]2 studies · 246 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Perinatal mortality
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 0.92 [0.06, 14.55]2 studies · 359 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Death or serious morbidity composite
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 0.54 [0.31, 0.94]1 study · 159 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 0.86 [0.42, 1.77]4 studies · 554 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adiposity ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diabetes ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neurosensory disability in later childhood ‐ not measured
Metformin vs glibenclamide ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Glibenclamide versus acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes

Population: women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 11 to 33 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caesarean section
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
RR 0.95 [0.53, 1.7]1 study · 43 participantsLow
Development of type 2 diabetes ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Perineal trauma ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Return to pre‐pregnancy weight ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postnatal depression ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Induction of labour ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Glibenclamide versus acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes

Population: women with gestational diabetes
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Large‐for‐gestational age
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 2.38 [0.54, 10.46]1 study · 43 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Perinatal mortality
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extracted1 study · 43 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Death or serious morbidity composite ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
RR 6.33 [0.87, 46.32]1 study · 43 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adiposity ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diabetes ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neurosensory disability in later childhood ‐ not reported
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ neonatal outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies