Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

48 questions · 55 findings · 31 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 17 · 30.9%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 15 · 27.3%Low 14 · 25.5%Moderate 7 · 12.7%High 2 · 3.6%

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · healthcare professionals responsible for patient care
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals and patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · healthcare professionals and patients
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · healthcare professionals responsible for patient care
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting healthcare professionals and patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · healthcare professionals and patients
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Differences in quality of life ( · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Health‐related quality of life ‐ all trials Higher scores indicate improved health‐related quality of life · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life 1 trial of single‐lens glasses… compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review