What do systematic reviews say?

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

• Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 286 participants
  Low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

• Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low

Low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening vs no LDCT screening

Low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life ‐ anxiety Time point: 10 months to 5… compared with no LDCT screening (low certainty).

• Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 8153 participants
  Low

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

• Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation followed by three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transcatheter… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Low glycaemic index (GI) or glycaemic load (GL) diets vs any other diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for people with overweight or obesity 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

• Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2742 participants
  Very low

Low glycaemic index (GI) or glycaemic load (GL) diets vs higher GI or GL diets

• Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for people with overweight or obesity 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 42 participants
  Very low

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Non‐specialist‐led showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (low certainty).

• Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 1.06
  605 participants
  Low

Reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Calf stretching vs placebo stretching

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Calf and hamstring stretching vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Interdisciplinary enhanced rehabilitation (inpatient rehabilitation) vs conventional rehabilitation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Interdisciplinary enhanced rehabilitation (inpatient and community rehabilitation) vs conventional rehabilitation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Wound drainage for lower limb arterial surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

• Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 153 participants
  Very low

Mepolizumab intravenous (IV) vs placebo

• Anti‐IL‐5 therapies for asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 369 participants
  High

Mepolizumab subcutaneous (SC) vs placebo

• Anti‐IL‐5 therapies for asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 1231 participants
  High

Benralizumab subcutaneous (SC) vs placebo

• Anti‐IL‐5 therapies for asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 2791 participants
  High

Reslizumab intravenous (IV) vs placebo

• Anti‐IL‐5 therapies for asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 1652 participants
  High