Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

23 questions · 28 findings · 17 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 8 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 1 · 3.6%Very low 4 · 14.3%Low 4 · 14.3%Moderate 11 · 39.3%High 0 · 0%

Digital adherence interventions vs usual care

Asthma exacerbations · people with asthma

Digital adherence interventions may leads to lower asthma exacerbations ‐ Number of people with one or more exacerbations compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.53 [0.32, 0.91]
6 studies · 678 participants
Low

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

Exacerbations (number of people experiencing ≥ 1 exacerbations) · the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes exacerbations: number of people experiencing at least one exacerbation compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.86 [0.58, 1.28]
2 studies · 485 participants
Very low

Digital technology vs usual care

Exacerbations (number of people experiencing ≥ 1 exacerbations) · adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis

Digital technology showed no clear difference in number of pulmonary exacerbations: number of participants… compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.92, 1.25]
1 study · 267 participants
Moderate