Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 3 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Embryo culture with low oxygen concentration vs embryo culture with atmospheric oxygen concentration

Congenital abnormalities · patients with congenital abnormalities

It is very uncertain whether embryo culture with low oxygen concentration changes congenital abnormalities compared with embryo culture with atmospheric oxygen concentration (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.2 [0.01, 4.09]
1 study · 647 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Congenital abnormalities per live birth · couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Regular (ICSI) versus ultra‐high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Congenital abnormalities · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1119 participants
GRADE not reported