It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes caesarean section compared with a different type of self‐monitoring (very low certainty).
Self‐monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with periodic glucose monitoring (low certainty).
Continuous glucose monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes caesarean section compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring at home changes caesarean section compared with hospitalisation (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether pre‐prandial changes caesarean section compared with post‐prandial glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal… probably leads to higher caesarean section for fetal distress and/or fetal acidosis compared with routine Pinard (outcomes (moderate certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).
It is very uncertain whether constant CGM changes caesarean section compared with intermittent CGM (very low certainty).
Continuous CTG may leads to higher caesarean section compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether telemedicine changes caesarean section compared with standard care (very low certainty).