Question · asked by 1 review
Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional: Caesarean section
- Population
- women with pre‐existing diabetes
- Intervention
- Automated telemedicine monitoring
- Comparison
- conventional
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional Caesarean section · women with pre‐existing diabetes It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty). Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.96 [0.62, 1.48] | 1 study · 32 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.