Question · asked by 1 review

Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose: Caesarean section

Population
women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Intervention
Continuous glucose monitoring system
Comparison
self‐monitoring of glucose
Outcome
Caesarean section

It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes caesarean section compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose
Caesarean section · women with gestational diabetes mellitus
It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes caesarean section compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty).
Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.91 [0.68, 1.2]2 studies · 179 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.