Adverse events · primary VUR
Antibiotic prophylaxis showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with surveillance or no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Allergic adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
It is very uncertain whether topical prophylaxis changes allergic adverse events compared with no topical prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropouts due to adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
It is very uncertain whether topical prophylaxis changes dropouts due to adverse events compared with no topical prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Gastrointestinal adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Topical prophylaxis showed no clear difference in gastrointestinal adverse events compared with no topical prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐serious adverse events · farmworkers
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics changes non‐serious adverse events compared with other antibiotics (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported · farmworkers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Allergic adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Topical plus systemic prophylaxis showed no clear difference in allergic adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropouts due to adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Topical plus systemic prophylaxis showed no clear difference in dropouts due to adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Gastrointestinal adverse events · adults receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Topical plus systemic prophylaxis showed no clear difference in gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐serious adverse events · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Antibiotics changes non‐serious adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported · farmworkers, soldiers, and people in endemic areas
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · primary VUR
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Incidence of adverse events ‐ isoniazid prophylaxis only · children with HIV infection aged 12 years and under
The intervention showed no clear difference in incidence of adverse events ‐ isoniazid prophylaxis only (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Incidence of adverse events ‐ co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis only · children with HIV infection aged 12 years and under
The intervention showed no clear difference in incidence of adverse events ‐ co‐trimoxazole prophylaxis only (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events · patients undergoing orthognathic surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse events · patients undergoing orthognathic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Maternal adverse events · pregnant women undergoing caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review