Search

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

32 questions · 55 findings · 6 reviews · Dental caries

No studies found 1 · 1.8%GRADE not reported 40 · 72.7%Very low 4 · 7.3%Low 2 · 3.6%Moderate 8 · 14.5%High 0 · 0%

Resin infiltration vs Non-invasive measures (fluoride varnish/toothpaste, flossing, oral hygiene instruction, sham/standard of care)

Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression · Children and adults with non-cavitated proximal (interproximal) caries lesions in primary and/or permanent teeth (ages 3-45)

Pooling 10 trials, resin infiltration reduced radiographic proximal caries progression versus non-invasive measures (OR 0.23); this subgroup was not separately GRADE-rated.

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs CPP-ACFP

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration did not differ significantly from CPP-ACFP (SMD -0.52, 95% CI -1.16 to 0.12; indirect evidence only); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration was significantly better than fluoride varnish (SMD -0.70, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.21); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs P11-4 + fluoride varnish

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration and P11-4 plus fluoride varnish did not differ significantly (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.62 to 0.65; indirect evidence only); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Self-assembling peptide P11-4

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration did not differ significantly from P11-4 alone (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.20); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs CPP-ACP

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration was significantly better than CPP-ACP (SMD -0.77, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.23); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Placebo or no active treatment

Remineralization / reduction in lesion severity (change in QLF, laser fluorescence, or lesion area) · Patients with white spot lesions / early caries lesions (WSLs/ECLs), including orthodontic and non-orthodontic lesions, active caries…

Resin infiltration significantly improved remineralization versus control (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.46 to -0.43), ranking second of seven therapies by SUCRA (88.7%); certainty of evidence not assessed (no GRADE).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Untreated control (natural remineralization)

Optical/esthetic improvement (visual-tactile assessment) · Patients with post-orthodontic white spot lesions (WSL)

Resin infiltration produced significantly greater optical improvement of white spot lesions than untreated (naturally remineralizing) controls (SMD 1.24, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.88; moderate certainty).

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish

Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading) · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL)

Resin infiltration produced significantly greater optical improvement than fluoride varnish (MD 4.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 8.78; moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs no treatment

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated approximal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on approximal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration may be more effective than no treatment for arrest or reversal of approximal carious lesions (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.13; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Sealant

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated approximal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on approximal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration may not differ from Sealant for arrest or reversal of approximal carious lesions (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.91; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated approximal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on approximal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration may not differ from Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of approximal carious lesions (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.23; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Baseline before resin infiltration

Lightness change · Patients with post-orthodontic white spot lesions and permanent dentition

Knosel (2019) reported a statistically significant lightness-change effect.

3 findings from 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Baseline before resin infiltration

Color change · Patients with post-orthodontic white spot lesions and permanent dentition

Eckstein (2015) reported a statistically significant color-change effect.

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Resin infiltration vs Non-invasive treatment

Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression · Patients with non-cavitated proximal (approximal) caries lesions (primary or permanent dentition)

Resin infiltration probably reduces the odds of proximal lesion progression compared with non-invasive treatment (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.29; moderate certainty).

6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish vs no treatment

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish was probably more effective than no treatment for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 3.2, 95% CI 2.24 to 4.56; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish vs Sealant

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated approximal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on approximal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish may not differ from Sealant for arrest or reversal of approximal carious lesions (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.48 to 7.52; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish vs Sealant

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish was probably more effective than Sealant for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.24; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review