Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

53 questions · 57 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 4 · 7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 23 · 40.4%Low 24 · 42.1%Moderate 6 · 10.5%High 0 · 0%

Oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated vs oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static

Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · induction of labour.

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated vs oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static

Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · induction of labour.

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes uterine hyperstimulation without FHR changes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated vs oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · induction of labour.

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol

Failure to achieve complete abortion · women undergoing first trimester abortion

Oral misoprostol probably leads to higher failure to achieve complete abortion compared with vaginal misoprostol (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review