Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,809 questions · 1,956 findings · 194 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 422 · 21.6%GRADE not reported 427 · 21.8%Very low 353 · 18%Low 397 · 20.3%Moderate 293 · 15%High 64 · 3.3%

Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline

Antibiotic resistance · people (any age) with active trachoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline

Adverse effects · people (any age) with active trachoma

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 6002 participants
GRADE not reported

Oral azithromycin vs control

Active trachoma · people (any age) with active trachoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter

Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter

Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter

Caesarean section · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter

Serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter

Serious maternal morbidity or death · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin

Participant global assessment VAS Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin

Pain VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin

Nodules score Nodule count · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin

Abscesses score Abscess count · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin

Physician global assessment VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Oral erythromycin vs placebo or no intervention

Clinical failure clinical observation · patients with BCG adverse reactions1

It is very uncertain whether oral erythromycin changes clinical failure clinical observation compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treating BCG‐induced disease in children 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.03 [0.7, 1.53]
3 studies · 148 participants
Very low

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Patient assessed efficacy ‐ pain · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 286 participants
Moderate

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Objective efficacy at end of · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 302 participants
Moderate

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Adverse effects: headache · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

Oral progestagens probably leads to lower side effects ‐ headache compared with other treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.58 [0.38, 0.87]
3 studies · 613 participants
Moderate

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Side effects ‐ hot flushes · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

Oral progestagens may leads to lower side effects ‐ hot flushes compared with other treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.49 [0.31, 0.76]
3 studies · 613 participants
Low

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Side effects ‐ genital bleeding · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

Oral progestagens may leads to higher side effects ‐ genital bleeding compared with other treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 4.69 [2.47, 8.9]
1 study · 271 participants
Low

Oral progestagens vs other treatment

Side effects ‐ amenorrhoea · patients with pain associated with endometriosis

It is very uncertain whether oral progestagens changes side effects ‐ amenorrhoea compared with other treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 4.95 [2.88, 8.52]
1 study · 252 participants
Very low