Oral erythromycin vs placebo or no intervention: Clinical failure clinical observation
It is very uncertain whether oral erythromycin changes clinical failure clinical observation compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral erythromycin vs placebo or no intervention Clinical failure clinical observation · patients with BCG adverse reactions It is very uncertain whether oral erythromycin changes clinical failure clinical observation compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty). Treating BCG‐induced disease in children (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.03 [0.7, 1.53] | 3 studies · 148 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treating BCG‐induced disease in children 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.