Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

11 questions · 12 findings · 8 reviews · Oral Health

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 10 · 83.3%Very low 1 · 8.3%Low 1 · 8.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Female sex vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)

Female sex prevalence (among children with caries) · Children with dental caries (deciduous and/or permanent dentition) in low- and middle-income countries

Among children with caries in LMICs, about half were female (pooled prevalence 0.497, 95% CI 0.475 to 0.519; 6 studies; I2=0%; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review

Female sex vs Male sex

Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents (10-19 years)

The abstract reports female sex is associated with worse OHRQoL, but the conclusion states the impact of gender was not clarified (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

2 findings from 1 review

Male sex vs Female sex

Dental caries susceptibility · Institutionalized orphan children (roughly 3 to 18 years)

Male institutionalized children had a marginally higher caries risk than females (RR 1.02), a non-significant difference (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Male sex vs Female sex

Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)

In the mandible, sex was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 1.38; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review

Male sex (boys) vs Female sex

Caries development in permanent teeth · School children and adolescents (6-18 years) followed from primary dentition (baseline examination before 72 months of age)

Gender is not associated with caries development in permanent teeth (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.02; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review