Macrolides vs placebo
Macrolides showed no clear difference in hospitalisation: all cause compared with placebo (low certainty).
- OR 0.56 [0.19, 1.62]2 studies · 151 participantsLow
Macrolides showed no clear difference in hospitalisation: all cause compared with placebo (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Macrolides showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with placebo (low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in ≥ 1 exacerbation compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Macrolides showed no clear difference in clinical cure: syndromic approach compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in clinical cure: aetiological approach compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether macrolides changes clinical improvement: syndromic approach compared with any other antibiotic (very low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: aetiological approach compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in microbiological cure compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether macrolides changes minor adverse events compared with any other antibiotic (very low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (ITT analysis) compared with penicillin (low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (evaluable participants) compared with penicillin (low certainty).
Macrolides showed no clear difference in incidence of relapse (evaluable participants) compared with penicillin (low certainty).