Laparaoscopic radical prostatectomy and robotic‐assisted… showed no clear difference in overall surgical complications (short‐term) compared with open radical prostatectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic and robotic‐assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.41 [0.16, 1.04]
1 study · 308 participants
Low

Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) + laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) vs LOD

Live birth · subfertile women with PCOS

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) + laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) vs LOD

Pregnancy rate · subfertile women with PCOS

It is very uncertain whether chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plus laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) changes pregnancy rate (per woman) compared with LOD (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 3.5 [0.72, 17.09]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) + laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) vs LOD

Adverse events · subfertile women with PCOS

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population

3 findings from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
Very low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
Very low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.26 [0.4, 3.93]
1 study · 51 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Adverse events · health problem or population

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 121 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Psychological outcomes ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Quality of life ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Analgesia requirements · health problem or population

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
GRADE not reported