Smoking cessation · young people
Behavioural interventions showed no clear difference in individual counselling (in‐person) vs control Smoking cessation compared with minimal control (low certainty).
5 findings from 1 review
RR 1.07 [0.83, 1.39]
7 studies · 2088 participants
Low
RR 1.35 [1.03, 1.77]
9 studies · 1910 participants
Low
RR 0.79 [0.5, 1.24]
3 studies · 340 participants
Low
Show 2 more findings
Contrasts: interventions versus saline gauze · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to requirement for RRT/initiation of dialysis · people with CKD
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether humour‐based interventions changes leaving the study early for any reason compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability ‐ total dropouts · children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events;
Psychosocial interventions showed no clear difference in dropouts for any reason at endpoint compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability ‐ total dropouts · adults (aged 18 and older) exposed to a traumatic event
It is very uncertain whether psychosocial interventions changes dropouts for any reason at endpoint compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Death Analysis 1.1
Interventions showed no clear difference in death Analysis 1.1 compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events Analysis 1.2
Interventions showed no clear difference in recurrent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events Analysis 1.2 compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events
Interventions showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sedentary time
1 finding from 1 review
Clinically important upper GI bleeding · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions probably leads to lower clinically important upper GI bleeding compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Nosocomial pneumonia · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions showed no clear difference in nosocomial pneumonia compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
ICU mortality · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality in ICU compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Duration of ICU stay · people admitted to intensive care units
1 finding from 1 review
Blood transfusion · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions probably leads to lower number of participants requiring blood transfusion compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people admitted to intensive care units
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Measures of occupational and task performance · children with DCD
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life and participation ‐ mobility and navigation intervention for not Pusher Syndrome (Analysis 1.2) · stroke survivors with somatosensory perception disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Activities of daily living · stroke survivors with somatosensory perception disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found