Cochrane · systematic review · CD010914
Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder
Miyahara, M, Hillier, SL, Pridham, L, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning ProblemsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 12.5%Ungraded 1 · 12.5%Very low 5 · 62.5%Low 1 · 12.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Task‐oriented interventions versus no intervention for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder (DCD)
Population: children with DCD
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
MABC,Total Impairment Score, RCTs and quasi‐RCTs. Scale from: 0 to 40. Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 169 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
MABC, Total Impairment Score, RCTs only. Scale from: 0 to 40. Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 51 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Adverse events Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 340 participants | Ungraded |
Changes in motor co‐ordination, as measured by standardised rating scales Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 111 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Measures of impairment (e.g. sensation, physical fitness) Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Measures of psychosocial factors Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 126 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Measures of occupational and task performance Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 40 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Measures of participation Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 49 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |