Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,486 questions · 2,727 findings · 268 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 600 · 22%GRADE not reported 229 · 8.4%Very low 789 · 28.9%Low 707 · 25.9%Moderate 314 · 11.5%High 88 · 3.2%

Environmental interventions vs no intervention

Blood lead levels (continuous)Blood lead level at end of duration Scale: 0–30 · children (aged 0–6 years)

2 findings from 1 review

Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 378 participants
Very low
Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 565 participants
Moderate

Environmental interventions vs no intervention

Cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes · children (aged 0–6 years)

2 findings from 1 review

Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 224 participants
Low
Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Environmental interventions vs no intervention

Household dust: floor dust lead levels · children (aged 0–6 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Child feeding interventions vs no intervention

Short‐term impact (< 12 months) child vegetable intake · children aged 5 years and under

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
19 studies · 2140 participants
Low

Child feeding interventions vs no intervention

Cost‐effectiveness ‐ not reported · children aged 5 years and under

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Child feeding interventions vs no intervention

Short‐term impact (< 12 months) unintended adverse events · children aged 5 years and under

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 39 participants
Very low

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

MABC, Total Impairment Score, RCTs only. Scale from: 0 to 40. · children with DCD

2 findings from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 169 participants
Very low
Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 51 participants
Low

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Adverse events · children with DCD

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 340 participants
GRADE not reported

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Changes in motor co‐ordination, as measured by standardised rating scales · children with DCD

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 111 participants
Very low

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Measures of impairment (e.g. sensation, physical fitness) · children with DCD

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Measures of psychosocial factors · children with DCD

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 126 participants
Very low

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Measures of occupational and task performance · children with DCD

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Task‐oriented interventions vs no intervention

Participation · children with DCD

1 finding from 1 review

Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 49 participants
Very low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

Diabetes‐related distress PAID and DDS scales

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
12 studies · 3315 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life Various questionnaires

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 1932 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

Adverse events Self‐reported outcomes

Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in adverse events Self‐reported outcomes compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.4 [0.78, 7.39]
3 studies · 438 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

Self‐efficacy

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 2675 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

HbA1c (%)

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 3165 participants
Low

Psychological interventions vs usual care

Diabetes complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Psychological interventions vs usual care

All‐cause mortality Medical records or reported by family members

Psychological interventions showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Medical records or reported by family members compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.17, 6.03]
3 studies · 1376 participants
Low