evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,024 questions · 3,338 findings · 330 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 735 · 22%GRADE not reported 282 · 8.4%Very low 962 · 28.8%Low 870 · 26.1%Moderate 384 · 11.5%High 105 · 3.1%

Multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) vs usual care

Number of people re‐admitted (all‐cause) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) probably leads to lower number of people re‐admitted (all‐cause) compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) vs usual care

Anti‐cytokine, all‐cause mortality ‐ uncertain risk of bias · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) changes mortality (all‐cause) overall analysis compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) vs usual care

Adverse events: number of people with 1 or more (all‐cause) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) changes adverse events: number of people with 1 or more (all‐cause) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control

Self‐efficacy · the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
2 findings from 1 review

Self‐management interventions vs usual care

Courses of oral corticosteroids · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Self‐management interventions including action plans for exacerbations showed no clear difference in courses of oral steroids compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV incidence (observational studies) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV prevalence compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HSV‐2 prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HSV‐2 prevalence compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Two or more sexual partners in last year · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in two or more sexual partners in last year compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher use of condom during last sexual intercourse compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Knowledge: condom can prevent STIs · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher knowledge: condom can prevent STIs compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Early developmental intervention programmes vs standard follow‐up

Cognitive outcome · preterm infants
3 findings from 1 review