Question · asked by 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care: HIV incidence (observational studies)

Population
low and high‐risk populations
Intervention
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
HIV incidence (observational studies)

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs standard care
HIV incidence (person/years) · low and high‐risk populations
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV… (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.69, 1.19]4 studies · 14279 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted…
2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.