What do systematic reviews say?

Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

Home‐based showed no clear difference in total mortality Number of deaths compared with centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (low certainty).

• Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.19 [0.65, 2.16]
  12 studies · 1647 participants
  Low

Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

• Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  24 studies · 2343 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

Home‐based showed no clear difference in withdrawal from the exercise programme Number of completers… compared with centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (low certainty).

• Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.04 [0.99, 1.08]
  23 studies · 2638 participants
  Low

Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

• Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  18 studies · 2207 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based vs clinic‐based specimen collection

Home‐based showed no clear difference in index case management (6 to 12 weeks of compared with clinic‐based specimen collection (moderate certainty).

• Home‐based versus clinic‐based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.88 [0.6, 1.29]
  3 studies · 1566 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based vs clinic‐based specimen collection

• Home‐based versus clinic‐based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  10 studies · 10479 participants
  Low

Home‐based vs clinic‐based specimen collection

Home‐based probably leads to lower positive test prevalence compared with clinic‐based specimen collection (moderate certainty).

• Home‐based versus clinic‐based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.72 [0.61, 0.86]
  9 studies · 3041 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based vs clinic‐based specimen collection

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Home‐based versus clinic‐based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 137 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 107 participants
  Low

Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 79 participants
  Moderate

Home‐based training vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Home‐based training vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether home‐based training changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (3 months) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.27, 1.02]
  1 study · 70 participants
  Very low

Comparison 8: home‐based family intervention vs treatment

Comparison 8: home‐based family intervention showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at six months compared with treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.02 [0.41, 2.51]
  1 study · 149 participants
  Low

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBRf only compared with routine care (low certainty).

• Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.36 [1.06, 1.75]
  3 studies · 4019 participants
  Low

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + health… compared with routine care (low certainty).

• Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.49 [1.22, 1.82]
  2 studies · 1502 participants
  Low

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + stickerh compared with routine care (low certainty).

• Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.46 [1.02, 2.09]
  1 study · 2182 participants
  Low

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found