Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation: Total mortality Number of deaths
Home‐based showed no clear difference in total mortality Number of deaths compared with centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Home‐based vs centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation Total mortality Number of deaths · Patients with heart disease Home‐based showed no clear difference in total mortality Number of deaths compared with centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (low certainty). Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.19 [0.65, 2.16] | 12 studies · 1647 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.