Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

901 questions · 1,073 findings · 138 reviews

No studies found 166 · 15.5%GRADE not reported 310 · 28.9%Very low 213 · 19.9%Low 227 · 21.2%Moderate 132 · 12.3%High 25 · 2.3%

High dose clonidine vs low dose clonidine

Number requiring additional analgesia required postoperatively ‐ moderate quality studies · patients with postoperative pain

High dose clonidine may leads to lower number requiring additional analgesia required postoperatively ‐… compared with low dose clonidine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs Resin-based sealant

Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures · Children with fully erupted permanent first molar teeth (mean age about 6 to 8 years)

At 48 months, no statistically significant difference was found between HVGIC and resin-based sealants (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.21); evidence ungraded and at high risk of bias.

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

High‐dose colchicine vs placebo

Proportion with 50% or greater decrease in inflammation score from baseline ‐ 32 to 36 hours · acute gout

High‐dose colchicine may leads to higher reduction of inflammation: proportion with 50% or greater decrease… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐dose colchicine vs placebo

Total adverse events · acute gout

High‐dose colchicine may leads to higher total adverse events compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐dose colchicine vs placebo

Participant global assessment of treatment success: proportion with 50% or greater decrease in pain score from baseline ‐ 32 to 36 hours · acute gout

High‐dose colchicine may leads to higher participant global assessment of treatment success: proportion with… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ASA + high‐dose LMWH vs ASA + low‐dose LMWH or UFH

Subcutaneous bruises · people with antiphospholipid antibodies and no history of thrombosis

ASA + high‐dose LMWH showed no clear difference in subcutaneous bruises compared with ASA + low‐dose LMWH or UFH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review