What do systematic reviews say?

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  14 studies · 873 participants
  Low

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  16 studies · 763 participants
  Low

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  12 studies · 712 participants
  Low

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  16 studies · 817 participants
  Low

Effects of high‐ vs low‐added sugar consumption

• High versus low‐added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  14 studies · 720 participants
  Low

High MCT formula vs low MCT formula

• High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 145 participants
  Very low

High MCT formula vs low MCT formula

• High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 82 participants
  Very low

High MCT formula vs low MCT formula

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

High MCT formula vs low MCT formula

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

High levels of PEEP vs low levels of PEEP

High levels of PEEP showed no clear difference in mortality before hospital discharge compared with low levels of PEEP (moderate certainty).

• High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.97 [0.9, 1.04]
  7 studies · 3640 participants
  Moderate

High levels of PEEP vs low levels of PEEP

• High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 2594 participants
  Low

High levels of PEEP vs low levels of PEEP

• High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 2309 participants
  Low

High levels of PEEP vs low levels of PEEP

• High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 1611 participants
  Moderate