Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

69 questions · 70 findings · 7 reviews

No studies found 5 · 7.1%GRADE not reported 7 · 10%Very low 30 · 42.9%Low 26 · 37.1%Moderate 2 · 2.9%High 0 · 0%

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Any sepsis – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE – Pure F‐LE vs IL · parenterally fed preterm infants with cholestasis

It is very uncertain whether fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) changes any sepsis – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE – Pure F‐LE vs IL compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vitamin A and fish oils (docosahexaenoic acid) vs placebo, vitamins, or no treatment

Visual acuitychange in logMAR visual acuity, may be reported as ETDRS · retinitis pigmentosa

It is very uncertain whether vitamin A and fish oils (docosahexaenoic acid) changes visual acuitychange in logMAR visual acuity, may be reported as ETDRS compared with placebo, vitamins (including vitamin A), or no therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs S‐LE

Severe (defined as stage 3 or greater) retinopathy of prematurity ‐ not reported · Parenterally fed preterm infants

All fish oil containing LE showed no clear difference in retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) compared with S‐LE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs S‐LE

Parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis · Parenterally fed preterm infants

All fish oil containing LE showed no clear difference in parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis compared with S‐LE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review