Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs S‐LE: Parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis
All fish oil containing LE showed no clear difference in parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis compared with S‐LE (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
All fish oil containing LE vs S‐LE Parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis · Parenterally fed preterm infants All fish oil containing LE showed no clear difference in parenteral nutrition‐associated liver disease/cholestasis compared with S‐LE (low certainty). Alternative lipid emulsions versus pure soy oil based lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.8 [0.29, 2.16] | 4 studies · 341 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative lipid emulsions versus pure soy oil based lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.