Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package… showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality rate (overall) (at month 12–26) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.05 [0.91, 1.21]
1 study · 95 participants
Low

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Proportion of perinatal deaths related to suboptimal carec (at months 12–26) · births

It is very uncertain whether perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package… changes proportion of perinatal deaths related to suboptimal carec (at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.14 [0.55, 2.37]
1 study · 95 participants
Very low

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Mortality measured by mortality rates including failure‐to‐rescuerates (3a) Stillbirth · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Neonatal mortality · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Mortality rate in children < 5 years of age · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Maternal mortality ‐ not reported · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Proportion of perinatal morbidity cases related to suboptimal carec (at months 12–26) · births

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package… probably leads to lower proportion of perinatal morbidity cases related to suboptimal carec… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.62 [0.4, 0.95]
1 study · 95 participants
Moderate

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Adverse effects · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Educational intervention with information only (theoretical dental health education, no practical training) vs usual care

Denture-induced stomatitis · Residents of institutions for elderly people (nursing staff and residents took part in the education programme)

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Schou 1989 (114 residents, unclear risk of bias): no difference in the prevalence of denture stomatitis between the groups.
1 study · 114 participants
GRADE not reported

Educational intervention with information only (theoretical dental health education, no practical training) vs usual care

Denture plaque · Residents of institutions for elderly people (nursing staff and residents took part in the education programme)

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
One study (Schou 1989), at unclear risk of bias and analysing 114 residents, provided insufficient evidence to determine whether denture plaque scores are lower when educating residents or nursing staff without…
1 study · 114 participants
GRADE not reported

Educational intervention with information only (theoretical dental health education, no practical training) vs usual care

Oral health-related behaviour (denture cleaning habits) · Residents of institutions for elderly people (nursing staff and residents took part in the education programme)

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Schou 1989 (114 residents, unclear risk of bias): the number of residents reporting correct denture cleaning habits increased, but not significantly compared to baseline (baseline N = 28; follow-up N = 38).
1 study · 114 participants
GRADE not reported

Enhanced educational intervention and structured follow‐up vs standard education

Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Enhanced educational intervention and structured follow‐up vs standard education

Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care

Denture plaque · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Educational intervention with information and practical components… showed no clear difference in denture plaque compared with (Optimised) usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 to 60 months
SMD -0.60 [-1.25, 0.05]
5 studies · 816 participants
Low