Community health educational interventions vs control: Late neonatal mortality
It is very uncertain whether community health educational interventions changes late neonatal mortality compared with control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Community health educational interventions vs control Late neonatal mortality · developing countries It is very uncertain whether community health educational interventions changes late neonatal mortality compared with control (very low certainty). Community‐based maternal and newborn educational care packages for improving neonatal health and survival in… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.54 [0.4, 0.74] | 11 studies · 186643 participants | Very low |
Community health educational interventions vs control Late neonatal mortality · developing countries Community health educational interventions probably leads to lower late neonatal mortality compared with control (moderate certainty). Community‐based maternal and newborn educational care packages for improving neonatal health and survival in… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.51 [0.36, 0.72] | 9 studies · 150867 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community‐based maternal and newborn educational care packages for improving neonatal health and survival in low‐ and middle‐income… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.