Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

720 questions · 804 findings · 103 reviews

No studies found 207 · 25.7%GRADE not reported 161 · 20%Very low 192 · 23.9%Low 160 · 19.9%Moderate 78 · 9.7%High 6 · 0.7%

Agricultural education with post‐harvest technologies vs usual agricultural support

Weight‐for‐length/height z‐score at the end of the intervention Weight scale, measurement boards and child growth reference · pregnant and lactating women, infants, and children
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: multimedia education and a co‐intervention vs co‐intervention alone

Skill acquisition Mean inhaler technique score (%), higher score indicates better technique. Scale from: 0 to 100. · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: multimedia education and a co‐intervention vs co‐intervention alone

Health outcome (Number who had a medical complication of pelvic inflammatory disease) · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers

Summary of findings: multimedia education and a co‐intervention showed no clear difference in health outcome (Number who had a medical complication of pelvic… compared with co‐intervention alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: multimedia education and a co‐intervention vs co‐intervention alone

Medication side effects Mean adverse self‐medication behaviour score (lower scores indicate safer self‐medication behaviour). Scale from: 0 to 40. · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
1 finding from 1 review

Sociodemographic and behavioural factors (older age, lower education, lower income, poor oral hygiene/brushing, smoking, disadvantaged/slum residence, sex) vs Referent groups (younger, higher education/income, better oral hygiene, non-slum residence)

Determinants of oral diseases · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs

Age, education, income, oral-hygiene behaviour, dental-visit pattern and slum/disadvantaged residence are associated with oral disease; gender effects are disease-specific; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review