What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 3 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 7 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy

Patient- and clinical-reported outcomes (tooth survival, clinical/radiographic success, pain) · Asymptomatic permanent teeth with deep caries (no symptoms)

No studies compared partial versus full pulpotomy in asymptomatic permanent teeth with deep caries, so no evidence is available.

1 finding from 1 review

The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth… 2025 All outcomes
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Tooth survival

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth… 2025 All outcomes
-
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy

Oral health-related quality of life · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain)

No included study reported oral health-related quality of life (a planned outcome), so no evidence is available.

1 finding from 1 review

The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth… 2025 All outcomes
>=6 months · University dental clinics, India (single-centre)
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy

Patient- and clinical-reported outcomes (tooth survival, clinical/radiographic success, pain) · Permanent teeth with deep caries and reversible pulpitis (non-spontaneous pain)

No studies compared partial versus full pulpotomy in permanent teeth with reversible pulpitis (non-spontaneous pain), so no evidence is available.

1 finding from 1 review

The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth… 2025 All outcomes
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Bio-active restorative materials vs Other restorative approaches

Clinical effectiveness · Children with carious primary teeth

No eligible randomized clinical trials of bio-active restorative materials were found.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
At least 12 months
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Bio-active restorative materials vs Any conventional restorative material

Treatment failure (planned; no eligible studies) · Children with carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy

No eligible studies were found evaluating bio-active restorative materials for restoring carious primary teeth after pulp therapy.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
No studies were found that reported on the use of restorative materials containing bio-active compounds for the restoration of carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy.
0 studies
No studies found

Bio-active restorative materials vs Any restorative material or technique

Not applicable (no eligible studies) · Children with carious primary teeth (no pulp therapy)

No eligible RCTs assessed new bio-active restorative materials in carious primary teeth; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
The search retrieved no randomized controlled trials on the clinical effectiveness of new bio-active restorative materials for carious primary teeth.
0 studies
No studies found