Question · asked by 1 review

Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy: Oral health-related quality of life

Population
Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain)
Intervention
Partial pulpotomy
Comparison
Full (complete) pulpotomy
Outcome
Oral health-related quality of life

No included study reported oral health-related quality of life (a planned outcome), so no evidence is available.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · >=6 months, University dental clinics, India (single-centre)
No included study reported oral health-related quality of life (a planned outcome), so no evidence is available.
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025) All outcomes
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth with a diagnosis of…
2025 All outcomes
July-August 2023 (1 July to 1 August 2023)2High / High
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.