Question · asked by 1 review

Bio-active restorative materials vs Any restorative material or technique: Not applicable (no eligible studies)

Population
Children with carious primary teeth (no pulp therapy)
Intervention
Bio-active restorative materials
Comparison
Any restorative material or technique
Outcome
Not applicable (no eligible studies)

No eligible RCTs assessed new bio-active restorative materials in carious primary teeth; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
New restorative materials with bio-active molecules (bio-active materials, BM) vs Any restorative material or technique
Not applicable (no eligible studies) · Children with carious primary teeth (no pulp therapy)
No eligible RCTs assessed new bio-active restorative materials in carious primary teeth; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp… (2022) All outcomes
The search retrieved no randomized controlled trials on the clinical effectiveness of new bio-active restorative materials for carious primary teeth.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.