Question · asked by 1 review
Bio-active restorative materials vs Any conventional restorative material: Treatment failure (planned; no eligible studies)
- Population
- Children with carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy
- Intervention
- Bio-active restorative materials
- Comparison
- Any conventional restorative material
- Outcome
- Treatment failure (planned; no eligible studies)
No eligible studies were found evaluating bio-active restorative materials for restoring carious primary teeth after pulp therapy.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bio-active restorative materials (containing bio-active compounds) vs Any conventional restorative material Treatment failure (planned; no eligible studies) · Children with carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy No eligible studies were found evaluating bio-active restorative materials for restoring carious primary teeth after pulp therapy. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated… (2022) All outcomes | No studies were found that reported on the use of restorative materials containing bio-active compounds for the restoration of carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review. 2022 All outcomes | December 28, 2020 | 5 | Low / Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.