Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

587 questions in 116 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent
Visual field progression · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent
Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone
Visual field progression · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled…
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Cataract surgery with Hydrus microstent vs cataract surgery alone
Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with cataracts and open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled…
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Schlemm´s canal microstent (Hydrus) for open angle glaucoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fenretinide vs placebo
Proportion of participants losing ≥ 10 EDTRS letters · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fenretinide vs placebo
Progression to advanced AMD (geographic atrophy or neovascular) · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fenretinide vs placebo
Mean change in macular sensitivity · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Emixustat vs placebo
Proportion of participants losing ≥ 10 EDTRS letters** · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Emixustat vs placebo
Progression to advanced AMD (geographic atrophy or neovascular) · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Emixustat vs placebo
Mean change in macular sensitivity · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fenretinide vs placebo
Proportion of participants losing ≥ 15 EDTRS letters · people with geographic atrophy due to AMD
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral azithromycin vs control
Ocular C trachomatis infection · people (any age) with active trachoma
Antibiotics for trachoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline
Antibiotic resistance Proportion of samples showing evidence of resistance to antibiotic · people (any age) with active trachoma
Antibiotics for trachoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Antibiotic vs control
Antibiotic resistance Proportion of samples showing evidence of resistance to antibiotic · people (any age) with active trachoma
Antibiotics for trachoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral vs topical antibiotic
Antibiotic resistance Proportion of samples showing evidence of resistance to antibiotic · people (any age) with active trachoma
Antibiotics for trachoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral azithromycin vs control
Active trachoma Clinical assessment: active trachoma defined as TF, TI, or both · people (any age) with active trachoma
Antibiotics for trachoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: anti‐VEGF treatment vs control
Reduction in central retinal thickness at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Routine preoperative medical testing vs selective or no testing
Clinical management changes (other than cancellation) prior to surgery · adults with age‐related cataract
Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Routine preoperative medical testing vs selective or no testing
Quality of life outcomes at any · adults with age‐related cataract
Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone
Change in ocular surface staining at 1‐month · people with dry eyea
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone
Change in Schirmer test (aqueous tear production, measured in mm/5 min) at 1‐month of · people with dry eyea
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone
Change in tear film stability, measured using tear break‐up time (TBUT) with fluorescein (in seconds) at 1‐month · people with dry eyea
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone
Change in tear osmolarity (measured in mOsmol/L, with reductions in osmolarity indicating clinical improvement) at 1‐month · people with dry eyea
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone
Adverse events at 1‐month · people with dry eyea
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Aqueous shunts with vs without mitomycin C
Control of IOP, assessed as the mean decrease in IOP from baseline · adults with glaucoma requiring aqueous shunt surgery
Aqueous shunts with mitomycin C versus aqueous shunts alone for glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Aqueous shunts with vs without mitomycin C
Mean change from baseline in visual acuity · adults with glaucoma requiring aqueous shunt surgery
Aqueous shunts with mitomycin C versus aqueous shunts alone for glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Aqueous shunts with vs without mitomycin C
Proportion of participants with stable best‐corrected visual acuity · adults with glaucoma requiring aqueous shunt surgery
Aqueous shunts with mitomycin C versus aqueous shunts alone for glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Aqueous shunts with vs without mitomycin C
Proportion of participants with decreased visual acuity · adults with glaucoma requiring aqueous shunt surgery
Aqueous shunts with mitomycin C versus aqueous shunts alone for glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Aqueous shunts with vs without mitomycin C
Proportion of participants with a postoperative hypertensive phase · adults with glaucoma requiring aqueous shunt surgery
Aqueous shunts with mitomycin C versus aqueous shunts alone for glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Pain control change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Micropulse vs continuous‐wave cyclophotocoagulation
Mean change in the mean deviation in study eyes change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Micropulse vs continuous‐wave cyclophotocoagulation
Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain control change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean change in the mean deviation in study eyes change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean number of glaucoma medications 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse events 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean change in the mean deviation in study eyes change from baseline 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Mean change in mean deviation in study eyes 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant
Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Autogenous fascia vs Gore‐Tex
Economic outcomes ‐ not measured · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Autogenous fascia vs Gore‐Tex
Quality of life ‐ not measured · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mersilene mesh vs autogenous fascia
Functional success of surgery ‐ not reported · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mersilene mesh vs autogenous fascia
Sling removal ‐ not reported · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mersilene mesh vs autogenous fascia
Infection ‐ not reported · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mersilene mesh vs autogenous fascia
Economic outcomes ‐ not reported · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mersilene mesh vs autogenous fascia
Quality of life ‐ not reported · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Gore‐Tex vs Ethibond
Economic outcomes ‐ not measured · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Gore‐Tex vs Ethibond
Quality of life ‐ not measured · frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis
Types of materials for frontalis sling surgery for congenital ptosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies