Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,333 questions · 1,344 findings · 217 reviews · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,344 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive / control treatment

Participant and operator perception · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in primary or permanent…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
None of the studies reported on participant or operator perception
0 studies
No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Patient satisfaction with treatment Measured by a validated scale · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic tooth movement);…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
Results: 'Our prespecified secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, improvement in occlusion, and prolonged stability of treatment were not measured in the trials.'
0 studies
No studies found

Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive / control treatment

Costs (direct and indirect) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in primary or permanent…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
None of the studies reported on costs for micro-invasive treatment or non-invasive control
0 studies
No studies found

Chlorhexidine mouthrinse vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
There were no trials on other products containing chlorhexidine such as sprays, toothpastes, chewing gums or mouthrinses.
0 studies
No studies found

Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk

Requirement for general anaesthesia due to dental procedures for caries · general population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)
0 studies
No studies found

Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs no intervention or control intervention (control)

Number of days in hospital (duration of hospitalisation) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Summary of findings for the main comparison (5FU solid cancers): Duration of hospitalisation (days) - 'No studies assessed this outcome'.
0 studies
No studies found

Endodontic therapy (surgical or non-surgical) performed with the aid of one or more magnification devices (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs The same endodontic therapy performed without magnification devices (without visual enhancers)

Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Magnification devices for endodontic therapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hall technique vs Non-restorative caries treatment

Time to restoration failure/retreatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
The studies did not measure this outcome.
0 studies
No studies found

Endodontic therapy (surgical or non-surgical) performed with the aid of one or more magnification devices (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs The same endodontic therapy performed without magnification devices (without visual enhancers)

Total time required to complete the clinical procedure · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Magnification devices for endodontic therapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No included study assessed procedure time; such outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.
Studies not reported
No studies found

Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk

Dental pain due to decay · general population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)
0 studies
No studies found

Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs no treatment

Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
Neither of these trials reported on the other secondary outcomes such as measures of pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or direct and indirect costs of interventions.
0 studies
No studies found

Transplantation of other teeth after extraction of the ankylosed teeth vs Conventional orthodontic treatment or follow-up with no specific treatment for ankylosis

Outcome not reported · Any patient with ankylosis and displacement of permanent front teeth diagnosed by clinical and radiographic assessment, with or without…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Prolonged stability of treatment (adjudged using an accepted scale) · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic tooth movement);…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
Results: 'Our prespecified secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, improvement in occlusion, and prolonged stability of treatment were not measured in the trials.'
0 studies
No studies found

Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk

Antibiotics due to dental infections · general population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No evidence found. (No information was reported by the included study.)
0 studies
No studies found

Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs placebo or no treatment

Staining · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
None of the studies reported on staining of tooth surfaces (not even Gisselsson 1999, the only trial testing stannous fluoride).
0 studies
No studies found

Endodontic therapy (surgical or non-surgical) performed with the aid of one or more magnification devices (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs The same endodontic therapy performed without magnification devices (without visual enhancers)

Repair of root perforations · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Magnification devices for endodontic therapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.
Studies not reported
No studies found

Micro-invasive treatment (proximal sealing or resin infiltration): resin sealant, glass ionomer sealant, polyurethane/adhesive patch, or resin infiltration vs Non-invasive / control treatment

Change in decayed, missing and filled (DMF/dmf) figures at surface, tooth and whole mouth level · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in primary or permanent…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No studies reported on caries measured as change in decayed, missing and filled (DMF/dmf) figures at surface, tooth or whole mouth level
0 studies
No studies found

Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs no intervention or control intervention (control)

Quality of life · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Summary of findings for the main comparison (5FU solid cancers): Quality of life - 'No studies assessed this outcome'.
0 studies
No studies found

Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs no intervention or control intervention (control)

Interruptions to cancer treatment (incidence) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Summary of findings 2 (melphalan/HSCT): Interruptions to cancer treatment - 'No studies assessed this outcome'.
0 studies
No studies found

Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)

Periodontal health status · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
No data were reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.
Studies not reported
No studies found