Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,562 questions · 1,645 findings · 107 reviews · Wounds

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 651 · 39.6%GRADE not reported 84 · 5.1%Very low 554 · 33.7%Low 283 · 17.2%Moderate 64 · 3.9%High 9 · 0.5%

Intervention not reported

Other adverse events · patients with venous leg ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Oral aspirin for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 71 participants
GRADE not reported

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Catheter‐related BSI ‐ overall comparison between chlorhexidine and povidone‐iodine (during in‐patient stay) · patients with a central venous catheter

It is very uncertain whether chlorhexidine changes catheter‐related BSI ‐ overall comparison between chlorhexidine and… compared with povidone‐iodine (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.41, 0.99]
4 studies · 1436 participants
Very low

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in aqueous solution versus povidone‐iodine in aqueous solution · patients with a central venous catheter

It is very uncertain whether chlorhexidine changes catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in aqueous solution… compared with povidone‐iodine (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.32, 1.28]
2 studies · 452 participants
Very low

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in alcohol versus povidone‐iodine in aqueous solution · patients with a central venous catheter

It is very uncertain whether chlorhexidine changes catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in alcohol versus… compared with povidone‐iodine (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.77 [0.39, 1.53]
2 studies · 503 participants
Very low

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in alcohol versus povidone‐iodine in alcohol · patients with a central venous catheter

Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in catheter‐related BSI ‐ subgroup: chlorhexidine in alcohol versus… compared with povidone‐iodine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.4 [0.13, 1.24]
1 study · 481 participants
Moderate

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Primary BSI or clinical sepsis · patients with a central venous catheter

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

All‐cause mortality ‐ Chlorhexidine in aqueous solution versus povidone‐iodine in aqueous solution Clinical assessment · patients with a central venous catheter

Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ Chlorhexidine in aqueous solution versus… compared with povidone‐iodine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.15 [0.72, 1.83]
1 study · 213 participants
Low

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

All‐cause mortality ‐ Chlorhexidine in alcohol versus povidone‐iodine in aqueous solution Clinical assessment · patients with a central venous catheter

Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ Chlorhexidine in alcohol versus… compared with povidone‐iodine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.48, 1.34]
1 study · 222 participants
Low

Chlorhexidine vs povidone‐iodine

Mortality attributable the CVC‐related infections. · patients with a central venous catheter

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter‐related infections 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Ulcers completely healed · people with venous leg ulcers

Sulodexide + local treatment may leads to higher proportion of ulcers completely healed (overall) compared with local treatment (low certainty).

4 findings from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.66 [1.3, 2.12]
3 studies · 438 participants
Low
Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.91 [1, 3.66]
1 study · 114 participants
Very low
Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.65 [1.2, 2.28]
2 studies · 324 participants
Low

Show 1 more finding

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.6 [1.17, 2.2]
1 study · 230 participants
Low

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Economic: direct costs · people with venous leg ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Time to complete healing · people with venous leg ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Change in ulcer size · people with venous leg ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Recurrence of ulcers · people with venous leg ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Adverse effects · people with venous leg ulcers

It is very uncertain whether sulodexide + local treatment changes adverse effects compared with local treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.44 [0.48, 4.34]
2 studies · 344 participants
Very low

Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment

Health‐related quality of life · people with venous leg ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Incidence of any surgical site infection · lower limb arterial surgery

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes incidence of any surgical site infection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wound drainage for lower limb arterial surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.33 [0.3, 5.94]
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Incidence of wound dehiscence · lower limb arterial surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Wound drainage for lower limb arterial surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Incidence of reoperation for wound or graft‐related complications · lower limb arterial surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Wound drainage for lower limb arterial surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Changes in health‐related quality of life · lower limb arterial surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Wound drainage for lower limb arterial surgery 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found