Cochrane · systematic review · CD010694

Sulodexide for treating venous leg ulcers

Wu, B, Lu, J, Yang, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

WoundsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 50%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 20%Low 3 · 30%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Sulodexide + local treatment compared to local treatment for treating venous leg ulcers

Population: patients with venous leg ulcers
10 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Proportion of ulcers completely healed (overall)
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
RR 1.66 [1.3, 2.12]3 studies · 438 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Proportion of ulcers completely healed at 30 days
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
RR 1.91 [1, 3.66]1 study · 114 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of ulcers completely healed at 60 days
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
RR 1.65 [1.2, 2.28]2 studies · 324 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Proportion of ulcers completely healed at 90 days
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
RR 1.6 [1.17, 2.2]1 study · 230 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to complete ulcer healing
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in absolute ulcer size
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ulcer recurrence
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
RR 1.44 [0.48, 4.34]2 studies · 344 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Health‐related quality of life
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Direct costs
Sulodexide + local treatment vs local treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies