Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,497 questions · 1,590 findings · 129 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 281 · 17.7%GRADE not reported 74 · 4.7%Very low 410 · 25.8%Low 420 · 26.4%Moderate 280 · 17.6%High 125 · 7.9%

Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life · cancer patients

1 finding from 1 review

Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well‐being and care needs of people with cancer 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 5752 participants
Very low

Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care

Distress at · cancer patients

1 finding from 1 review

Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well‐being and care needs of people with cancer 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
13 studies · 5577 participants
Very low

Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care

Care needs · cancer patients

1 finding from 1 review

Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well‐being and care needs of people with cancer 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 2331 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Caregiver psychological distress · caregiver well‐being

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 6 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Caregiver burden · caregiver well‐being

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Caregiver mastery · caregiver well‐being

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Quality of patient–caregiver relationship · caregiver well‐being

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Caregiver quality of life · caregiver well‐being

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 6 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Caregiver physical functioning – not measured · caregiver well‐being

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Overall survival · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Rate of ISC one month after operation · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Time to PVR ≤ 50 mL (days) · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in time to PVR ≤ 50 mL (days) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 111 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

PVR one month after operation (mL) · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in PVR one month after operation (mL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 86 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Perioperative complications (excluding bladder dysfunction) · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in perioperative complications (excluding bladder dysfunction) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.55 [0.24, 1.26]
3 studies · 180 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Disease‐free survival (median · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes disease‐free survival (median (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 0.63 [0, 106.95]
1 study · 86 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Quality of life · women with stage Ia2 to IIa cervical cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Nerve‐sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Mindfulness‐based stress reduction training vs usual care

Menopause‐specific quality of life (quality of life) · female BRCA carriers post‐risk‐reducing surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

Psychosocial intervention to improve sexual health vs no intervention

Effect on later sexual function · adult women, 18 years of age or older, who tested positive for a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and who had had risk‐reducing surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

Psychosocial intervention to improve sexual health vs no intervention

Body image · adult women, 18 years of age or older, who tested positive for a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and who had had risk‐reducing surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported

Psychosocial intervention to improve sexual health vs no intervention

Sexual self‐efficacy scale · adult women, 18 years of age or older, who tested positive for a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and who had had risk‐reducing surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 37 participants
Very low