Cochrane · systematic review · CD012387
Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well‐being and care needs of people with cancer
Schouten, B, Avau, B, Bekkering, GTRUDYE, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs compared to usual care in people with cancer
Population: People with cancer
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
HRQoL Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 14 studies · 5752 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Distress Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 13 studies · 5577 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Care needs Screening of psychosocial well‐being and care needs vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 2331 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |